May 31, 2023

Complete News World

Viral Video Twitter | The well-known Spanish presenter refuses to say “everyone” on live TV: “I will follow what RAE says” | Viral

Ana Ruiz is a well-known Spanish presenter who has caused a great deal of controversy in her country by refusing to say “dots” during a live broadcast. The woman caused a great deal of controversy in front of the audience.I go for what RAE says”. His statements were published Quickly and This opened up a huge debate where some supported her and others agreed with the community.

Canal Sur presenter Ana Ruiz greeted the audience and started her show. Second, the artist and singer referred to the word “dots”. Andalusian also recalled the status of the Royal Spanish Academy (RAE).

Hello everyone. I do not say “tots” because it is not within the language academy. I reject its use, what do I want to tell you? Whatever the Royal Academy of Languages ​​tells me, I will go with it, because it enlightens me, guides me, not just me, but our competitors as well. ” Ruiz revealed.

Controversy on social websites

Immediately, one of the audience who rejected Ruiz’s words shared the moment via Twitter. From there, numerous criticisms and insults began against the canal sur provider. So far, the clip has amassed more than 60,000 breeds.

Comment by RAE

The Royal Spanish Academy, the most important institution in terms of the rules and regulations of the Spanish language, has always spoken out against the use of the word “dots”. “The use of the letter ‘e’ as a gender symbol is foreign to the morphology of the Spanish language”, Explained on social media. In addition, he described it “Unnecessary”, Because “Grammatical masculine (” boys “) already performs that function as an unmarked word for anti-gender”.

See also  Andres Hurtado, his ex-wife Marilyn Mandeil and 'La India' | Eye-sight

What is an inclusive language?

The Real Academy defines the language of inclusion β€œA set of strategies aimed at avoiding the general use of grammatical masculinity, ignoring the fact that it is based on its condition as an unmarked term of anti-gender, and is not said to be the sexual orientation of the linguistic system.”.