June 8, 2023


Complete News World

Viral Video Twitter | Host Ana Ruiz refused to say “everyone” in the middle of the show: “I follow what RAE says” | Trends | Spain | Inclusive language | Nnda nnrt | Viral

Controversy over inclusive language continues. A clear example is presenter Ana Ruiz, who created a huge controversy For refusing to use the word “dots” in the middle of the show he presented in front of all the live viewers. β€œI carry what the RAE saysSaid the 42-year-old Spaniard. The Became And caused dissatisfaction among audiences who relied on language.

Canal Sur presenter Ana Ruiz greeted the audience and started her show. Second, the artist and singer referred to the word “dots”. Andalusian also recalled the status of the Royal Spanish Academy (RAE).

Hello everyone. I do not say “tots” because it is not within the language academy. I reject its use, what do I want to tell you? Whatever the Royal Academy of Languages ​​tells me, I will go with it, because it enlightens me, guides me, not just me, but our competitors as well. ” Ruiz revealed.

Controversy on social websites

Immediately, one of the audience who rejected Ruiz’s words shared the moment via Twitter. From there, numerous criticisms and insults began against the canal sur provider. So far, the clip has amassed more than 60,000 breeds.

Comment by RAE

The Royal Spanish Academy, the most important institution in terms of the rules and regulations of the Spanish language, has always spoken out against the use of the word “dots”. “The use of the letter ‘e’ as a gender symbol is foreign to the morphology of the Spanish language”, Explained on social media. In addition, he described it “Unnecessary”, Because “The grammatical masculine (” boys “) already performs that function as an unmarked word for anti-gender”.

See also  β–· Patria System Bonds Due November 2022 | Answers

What is an inclusive language?

The Real Academy defines the language of inclusion β€œThe set of strategies aimed at avoiding the general use of grammatical masculinity ignores the fact that it is based on its condition as an unmarked term of gender resistance and is not dependent on the alleged sexual orientation of the linguistic system.”.