February 7, 2023


Complete News World

After the coup of Pedro Castillo there were at least 12 lawyers Politics

Since he staged his coup nearly a month ago and was arrested for sedition, the former president At least 12 lawyers worked on its behalf. According to experts consulted by El Comercio, behind these constant changes can be found a possible scapegoating strategy to accuse them of not respecting their right to security.

Castillo was with him when he was arrested on December 7 His former chief of staff accepted his defense in his alleged actions.

Torres was with Castillo the next day at a hearing in which Supreme Court Justice Juan Carlos Segle reviewed his custody. There, prosecutor Víctor Pérez Liendo argued that his charges were insufficient to acquit Castillo. Pérez Liendo also signed a letter on Castillo’s behalf in which he requested asylum with the Mexican government.

View: Alberto Otárola: “Peru is on the edge of the corporate abyss”

Confirming the arrest of the former president, several other lawyers joined his entourage. One of them was Guillermo Oliveira, who appealed the arrest and held impromptu press conferences outside Tinos. In one of these, Castillo said he was “a little dizzy” when he delivered his blow. On December 9, Ronald Atencio, lawyer and counsel to Congressman Guillermo Bermejo, joined the defense.

However, the next day Castillo appointed a new bodyguard: Miguel Pérez Arroyo, a former bodyguard of former President Alberto Fujimori, and Maria Adriano.

Perez told El Comercio that it was Castillo who called him through an intermediary on December 10. “He said to me: ‘Doctor, you must accept my protection, they have recommended me, they spoke well of you, and you must come and see me soon,'” he said.

See also  North Korea | Kim Yo Jong, sister of leader Kim Jong-un without filter | South Korea | USA | Moon Jae-in | Yoon Suk-yeol | the world

Peres explained that he was resigning because of the “irrelevance” of what the defense would look like: “We are not going to do a political defense.” On the other hand, he demanded that Castillo alone decide the defense: “[Fue] One of those things that didn’t happen. Those who were constantly around him, who voiced their opinions”.

After Perez’s departure, on December 12, Atencio was recognized as lead attorney. Raul Noblecilla, close to Bermejo, also joined him. However, both did not participate in the detention hearing of the former president. Neither did the investigator.

Considering this and respecting his right to defend himself, the Supreme Court adjourned the trial and assigned him public defense attorneys: Ítalo Díaz and Jhans Ventura. He was the first to speak at the December 16 hearing, after which the Department of Justice (PJ) sentenced Castillo to 18 months in prison. Three days later, Atencio and Noblecilla resigned without explaining their reasons.

For the appeal, Castillo hired Wilfredo Robles and Paulino Loa as lawyers, who did not prevent his prison sentence from being approved. On December 29, “Perú 21” revealed that Robles had been jailed for terrorism. In an interview on Exitosa radio, the lawyer acknowledged the time spent in jail the same day, but denied there was a conviction.

In the following days, Loa resigned and Sandro Balvin appeared in the media as Castillo’s new lawyer. As he said, he was going to reorganize the defense and he aimed to be prosecuted independently.

View: They Approve Detention Against Pedro Castillo: What Did the Judiciary Argue?

El Comercio’s sources indicated that Balvin has not yet been formally authorized to stand trial. Robles did not respond to this newspaper’s query to confirm his withdrawal from the defense.

See also  In China's view, Japan is breaking its past and offering strong support to Ukraine


Gilmer Andia, former deputy minister of justice, said there are two possible explanations for this instability. For one thing, Castillo didn’t trust or believe the strategies proposed by his subsequent attorneys. Second, it is a strategy to argue “lack of defense”: he has no suitable defense in his action.

Sophia Icaza, a lawyer at Estudio Linares, admitted that we will face a strategy of alleging a violation of the right to security before events such as the Inter-American Court, where the former president is expected to appeal. “As they say colloquially: they prepare the field,” he said.

Perez has a similar analysis: “It appears to be a strategy to claim insecurity later.” However, he clarified that there was no bar to the PJ or prosecution of Castillo’s right to counsel while he was his lawyer.